Guidelines for Reviewers

We are sharing some guidelines for reviewing the papers to onboard new community members in the reviewing process and ensure consistency/quality across reviews. For each paper review, you will enter an overall score and a detailed review text, including a justification for your score. When reviewing the submitted paper, please consider the following points.

• [Novelty and Relevance] The submission addresses novel questions that are of interest to the ISSEP community.
• [Soundness] The submission's methods and results soundly address the posed research questions;
• [Connections to Prior Literature] The submission is grounded in relevant prior work and contributes substantially beyond the existing literature;
• [Clarity and Reproducibility] The submission is written clearly enough to be published, and the methods are clear enough to be reproduced.